TabMenu

Poverty and InequalitySexual and Reproductive HealthFamily, Maternal & Child HealthMethodology

Neighborhood socioeconomic environment and sexual network position

TitleNeighborhood socioeconomic environment and sexual network position
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2010
AuthorsFichtenberg, CM, Jennings, JM, Glass, TA, Ellen, JM
JournalJournal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
Volume87
Pagination225-235
Date PublishedMar
ISBN Number1468-2869; 1099-3460
Accession Number20140533
Keywords*Residence Characteristics, *Sexual Behavior, *Social Class, Adolescent, African Americans, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Risk Assessment, San Francisco/epidemiology, Sexually Transmitted Diseases/*epidemiology/transmission, Social Environment, Unsafe Sex, Young Adult
Abstract

Rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are strongly associated with neighborhood poverty; however, the mechanisms responsible for this association remain unclear. Using a population-based study of sexual networks among urban African American adolescents, we tested the hypothesis that poverty, unemployment, and the sex ratio drive STI rates by affecting sexual network structure. Participants were categorized as being in one of three network positions that had previously been found to be strongly linked to infection with chlamydia and gonorrhea: being in a confirmed dyad (i.e., a monogamous pair), being connected to a larger network through one partner, and being in the center of a larger network. We found that only poverty was statistically significantly associated with sexual network position. Residing in the poorest third of neighborhoods was associated with 85% decreased odds of being in confirmed dyads. There was no association of sexual network position with neighborhood employment. Living in a neighborhood with an unequal number of young men and women appeared to be associated with a higher likelihood of being in a confirmed dyad; however, the differences were not statistically significant. These results suggest that poverty may impact STI rates by shaping sexual network structure, but we did not find any evidence that this association operates through unemployment or the sex ratio.

PMCID

2845836